Results of the Member Survey
Ken Lyons, Web Page Administrator >
A member survey was initiated in October on our website. The survey
is intended to be an ongoing effort. Members
can still access it, and the response records can be modified at
any time. Now is a good time to review the results received to date.
At this writing, we have 697 responses,
530 from members. The survey drew nearly as large a web response as
our election did last year. The respondents come from 26 countries,
and 48 of the 50 states. In this article, I will give numbers from
the total responses with the member response in parenthesis, unless
otherwise stated.
One of the issues of immediate interest
is delivery of the Newsletter. Of the respondents, 413 (404) said that
they "always" or "frequently" read the Newsletter. Overall 45% (56%)
of the respondents stated a preference for a paper copy. Of the ones
stating a preference, the ones who read the Newsletter more frequently
tend to prefer paper copies:
Frequency of reading the Newsletter |
Always |
Frequently |
Rarely |
Never |
% preferring paper copy |
76% |
66% |
41% |
38% |
The significance of the last column is
unclear, but there appears to be a strong case for providing both modes
of access. Those who pay close attention to FEd matters tend to prefer
having the paper copy. But the roughly 15% of the members who "rarely" look
at it, might pay more attention when it's available on the web. Presuming
that this preference carries over to other members who have yet to
fill out the survey (about 85% of our membership), this could mean
that the web presence is quite important for these less-involved members. Yet,
at the same time, the members who strongly support our activities favor
the paper copy quite heavily, so doing away with it entirely may not
be the best idea. Our current experiment along those lines is proceeding,
so we shall see what future member feedback tells us.
It is interesting to note that among our
45 responding foreign members, fully 80% said that they always or frequently
read the Newsletter, and, of those, 72% said that they prefer paper. So
even our foreign members, who presumably have a harder time receiving
the paper copy, prefer it to web access.
Another area of interest in the survey
results has to do with the interests and concerns of our members. I've
been able to look over the results and organize them according to the "votes" that
various items received. I should hasten to add that this isn't
really a voting procedure! If a small group is interested in
an item, they can still have an impact, when they get involved. But
the survey provides us with some idea of what is important to the members,
as well as information as to whom to contact when opportunities for
involvement arise. For example, only 27% of our members indicated
an interest in political action, but that group could make a big difference
if they act in a concerted manner.
In the tables below I'll report only member
responses.
What are members interested in or concerned
about? The ones receiving the highest responses follow:
Member concerns and interests top 7 |
Undergraduate curriculum |
427 |
High school curriculum |
273 |
Professional development of current teachers |
255 |
Graduate level physics education |
220 |
Science content standards |
204 |
Local alliances between teachers and physicists |
202 |
Science teaching standards |
183 |
Among the activities in which our
members are involved either as volunteers or professionally, the following
areas drew the heaviest responses:
Member Involvement top 10 |
Undergraduate curriculum |
397 |
Mentoring undergraduate research |
382 |
Education of K-12 teachers |
276 |
Science Fairs |
260 |
Local high schools |
239 |
Develop demo equipment |
221 |
Weekend or summer science programs |
205 |
APS/AAPT committees |
182 |
Education research |
182 |
Development of funding for student
research |
168 |
It appears that a good fraction of the
respondents combined the volunteer and professional activities in that
section of the questionnaire, so
I don't think we can separate the two categories very easily.
The good news, I think, is that we have
a large number of members who are interested and involved in important
issues regarding education. The challenge is to find ways to tap into
that pool. There is a wealth of information in this survey, and as
we go forward it should enable the Executive Committee to target approaches
to members based on their interests in various areas. This capability
will be important in fulfilling our charter goal of facilitating the
involvement of our members in activities that benefit physics education
at all levels.
Ken Lyons, a long-time contributor
to the Forum, is a physicist at AT&T Research in Florham Park,
New Jersey
|