FEd August 1998 Newsletter - Editor's Corner
FORUM ON EDUCATION
August
1998
|
|
Editor's Corner
Samuel Bowen
This summer newsletter is the contribution of a new editor. I have
just returned to university teaching after 10 years in the Division
of Educational Programs at Argonne National Laboratory. While there
I was very involved in DOE programs in support of science teaching,
encouraging minority students to chose science careers, and telecommunications
for pre-college teachers. This issue will express a number of my interests
and experiences. Readers are invited to send reactions, corrections,
suggestions, and contributions for future issues after reading this
issue.
In this issue we continue to examine the ABET changes which will
change the future for a number of physics departments. Robert Ehrlich
reports on a survey of engineering deans and their concerns about physics
courses for their students. A brief summary from the ABET web page
lists the engineering disciplines which do not have physics listed
as an explicit requirement. The fall AAPT/APS meeting to revitalize
undergraduate physics teaching is profiled. Richard Hake re-iterates
his findings on the impact of teaching introductory physics so that
students are more fully engaged. Your editor has a fairly long and
detailed analysis of the high school physics test which was given in
18 countries as a part of the TIMSS study. A collection of addresses
and resources which represent some organizations working to improve
pre-college education has been compiled for physicists who may not
have looked at this area before. Two pre-college efforts from the past
are reviewed and their current condition and futures are discussed.
These are the Chicago Teachers Academy for Mathematics and Science
which was started by Leon Lederman and the TIMS (Teaching Integrated
Math and Science) set of laboratory exercises which was created by
Howard Goldberg. Your editor has assembled an introductory web-survey
of the field of cognitive psychology and learning theory in which notions
of "naive" physics (decidedly non-newtonian) are described
briefly. Tom Rossing has another contribution of his browsing the literature.
I hope you find the issue stimulating.
|