FORUM FUNDING NEWS
-
- Ken Lyons
[Note: This article was omitted from the April newsletter, due to space limitations.]
Many of you are aware that changes have been under consideration in the
formula used to determine forum funding levels by APS. This was brought
about by a concern from the APS side about the amount of funding going
to the forums, and from the forum side (all the forums, not just FEd) with
regard to adequate funding for activities such as the newsletter publication.
A task force met in January to consider ways out of the impasse, and
concluded with a consensual agreement among all participants for a recommendation
to be made to the APS Council. The gist of this agreement, from our standpoint,
is that for forums above 3% of APS membership (FEd is close to 10%) the
forum will receive $2.50 in funding for each member. A funding floor is
also provided to support executive committee meetings, etc. In return for
maintaining this level of funding, which is sufficient to maintain our
newsletter activity, members will be allowed to receive only two free forum
memberships at renewal time, rather than unlimited ones (which would have
meant up to six by next year). Additional memberships will cost the same
as membership in a Division. This compromise has been recommended to Council
with strong support from the entire task force. It will probably be implemented
with the next renewal cycle, in June.
As part of our consideration of ways to reduce our expenses, we are considering
the possibility of offering an electronic option on our newsletters: so
that members would have the option of requesting that their paper copy
not be mailed. Members who do this would be notified by email when the
newsletter copy is available on the WWW homepage (a few weeks BEFORE the
paper mailing date), and they could then access it there. This would make
a significant difference only if a sizable number of members were interested--hence
we have recently added a question about this to the Member Survey (see
related article). At this writing we do not have enough feedback on the
question to make an intelligent assessment of the level of interest. If
you would be interested in this option, as a way of helping us reduce our
expenses, please access the survey on the WWW homepage and so indicate
on your response record.
|